PER CURIAM.
Although appellant did not file the transcript within 100 days after signing of judgment required by Tex.R.Civ.P. 386, she did file a "Motion for Extension of Time" to file the transcript within the time permitted by Tex.R.Civ.P. 21c. Appellant's alleged "reasonable explanation" under Rule 21c for the late filing was that she desired to appeal only one conclusion of law in the judgment, and thus attempted to have opposing counsel agree to limit the documents...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.