IN RE REAPPORTIONMENT OF COLO. GEN. ASSEMBLY

No. 82SA6.

647 P.2d 191 (1982)

In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF the COLORADO GENERAL ASSEMBLY.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Rehearings Denied March 1, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph A. Cole, Denver, pro se objector.

Gerald Dahl, Frisco, and Arnold Alperstein, Alperstein, Alperstein & Forman, P. C., Denver, for certain residents of Eagle, Grand, Jackson, Pitkin, Routt, Summit, Boulder, Gilpin, Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties.

Jac K. Sperling, Denver, for Raymond Bullock (Jefferson County Resident) and Jeanette Scotland (Boulder County Resident).

Gary Sandblom, Denver, for Michael T. Rabb and Jay Brizie (Boulder County Residents).

James R. Stitt, Rodney R. Nowadzky, Stitt, Wittenbrink & Nieman, Westminster, for City of Westminster.

Wyatt B. Angelo, Russell, Angelo & Wright, P.C., Gunnison, for Consolidated Gunnison County Group.

Charles M. Dosh, Denver, for Thomas P. Briggs and William G. DeGroot (Denver County Residents).

Stephen Davis, Denver, for Rae Hilbert and Kathryn L. Pride (Denver County Residents).

Durant D. Davidson, La Junta, for Consolidated Otero County Group.

Cile Pace, Asst. County Atty., Jefferson County, for Norman C. Allen, Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder.

Alfred J. Romano, Chairman, Larimer County Republican Party, Daniel A. Campbell, Jesse T. and Anne M. Kelsey, Eldorado Estates Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. (Jeffrey Waller, Acting President), Charles L. Dunahue, Republican Captain, Dist. No. 1, Katherine E. Lillich, Republican Captain, Dist. No. 1, Lucio Rodriguez, Republican Captain, Dist. No. 2, Edna Shellhammer, Republican Captain, Dist. No. 2, Robert W. Terry, Phillip and Barbara Fresquez, Lila D. Greaves, pro se protestors.

Jon L. Holm, Holm & Christensen, Leonard M. Campbell, Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker & Grover, Denver, for Colo. Com'n on Reapportionment.


PER CURIAM.

The sections of the Colorado Constitution establishing a system for reapportionment of the General Assembly to reflect population changes in the 1980 federal census require us to review the reapportionment plan. Colo.Const. Art. V, §§ 46, 47 and 48.1 We conclude that the plan adopted by the Colorado Reapportionment Commission (Commission)2 complies with the criteria in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases