Upon remittal, the Surrogate construed the provisions of the trust so as to require that payments to alternate beneficiaries, while payments to Robert Bahr were suspended during his hospitalization, should total $50 per month even though the trust res generated a larger income. The trustee brought this appeal averring that "there is no adverse party upon whom this appeal should be served." We disagree. Since this appeal involves the legality of accumulation of trust...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
