1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 31 Wn.
  5. 31 Wn. App. 50 (1982)
 

HALLMANN v. STURM RUGER & COMPANY

No. 4392-II.

31 Wn. App. 50 (1982)

639 P.2d 805

JOE HALLMANN, ET AL, Petitioners, v. STURM RUGER & COMPANY, INC., ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

January 15, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bryce H. Dille, for petitioners.

Stuart P. Hennessey, for respondents.

PETRICH, J.

This matter is before this court on petition of the plaintiffs, Joe and Debbie Hallmann, for discretionary review of an order of the Superior Court revoking permission of one of their attorneys to appear pro hac vice. We are asked to find the Hallmanns' attorney was deprived of due process because he did not receive prior notice the trial court intended to revoke permission nor was he advised of the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases