1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 306 Pa.Super.
  5. 306 Pa.Super. 494 (1982)
 

BODEN v. TOMPKINS

306 Pa.Super. 494 (1982)

452 A.2d 833

Evan H. BODEN and Joseph B. Buzard, Appellants, v. Edwin W. TOMPKINS, II.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed November 19, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Stenhach, Coudersport, for appellants.

Gordon J. Daghir, St. Marys, for appellee.

Before WIEAND, McEWEN and POPOVICH, JJ.

WIEAND, Judge:

In this appeal it is alleged that Pa.R.C.P. 218, the so-called "240 Day Rule",1 now vacated, was invalid because it constituted judicial legislation and was in conflict with Rule 1901 of the Rules of Judicial Administration. We are unable to consider these issues, however, because the appeal was not timely filed and must be quashed.

The order dismissing appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases