1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 678 F.2d
  5. 678 F.2d 113 (1982)
 

ONADEKO v. RAINIER CREDIT CO.

No. 80-3527.

678 F.2d 113 (1982)

Olayinka and Amelia ONADEKO, Appellees, v. RAINIER CREDIT COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 27, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Waggoner, Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Biggs & Ericsson, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Patricia Halsell, Law Student, argued, for appellees; Richard A. Slotte, Portland, Or., on brief.

Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rainier Credit Company appeals from the judgment of the district court awarding Olayinka and Amelia Onadeko $916.78, plus costs and attorney's fees, for Rainier's violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. The question presented is whether the language "and all other amounts due or to become due hereunder" in Rainier's description of its security interest violated Regulation Z under the Act, 12 C.F.R. § 226.8(b)(5...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases