PER CURIAM.
No doubt through inadvertence, the trial court found appellant had violated his probation as set forth in Counts I, II, III, and IV. Actually, the State withdrew Count II, as it was unable to offer any proof of the facts alleged therein. On appeal the State concedes appellant should not have been violated on said count.
Accordingly, the order appealed from is modified to delete any reference to Count II and, as so modified, the order and sentence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
