1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 112 Mich.
  5. 112 Mich. App. 675 (1982)
 

BLAKELY DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS DRAINAGE DIST. v. CITY OF WOODHAVEN

Docket Nos. 52605 to 52608, 52673.

112 Mich. App. 675 (1982)

317 N.W.2d 220

BLAKELY DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS DRAINAGE DISTRICT v. CITY OF WOODHAVEN. BROWNSTOWN CREEK DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS DRAINAGE DISTRICT v. CITY OF WOODHAVEN.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided January 8, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey A. Supowit, for plaintiffs.

Daniel J. Andrews, for defendant City of Woodhaven.

Kurt E. Riedel, for defendant City of Gibraltar.

Charles J. Lowther, for defendant City of Romulus.

James A. Kandrevas, for defendant City of Southgate.

William J. DeBiasi, P.C., for defendant Township of Brownstown.

Richard G. James, for defendant Township of Huron.

Before: R.M. MAHER, P.J., and D.F. WALSH and D.C. RILEY, JJ.

D.C. RILEY, J.

Defendants appeal as of right from writs of mandamus issued by the trial court ordering defendants to levy assessments for engineering fees and administrative costs incurred as a result of two drainage projects. Although the drainage districts were separate and involved separate drainage areas, our statement of facts to follow applies to both drains.

The Blakely Drain and the Brownstown Creek Drain are major drains which cross the several communities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases