1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 87 A.D.2d
  5. 87 A.D.2d 697 (1982)
 

DI PROSPERO v. FORD MOTOR CO.

87 A.D.2d 697 (1982)

Ernesto Di Prospero et al., Appellants, v. Ford Motor Company, Respondent, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 11, 1982

Order affirmed, with costs (see Trevithick v Abbott Labs., 72 A.D.2d 840, app dsmd 48 N.Y.2d 1027).

Mahoney, P. J. (dissenting).

I dissent. Here, the proposed complaint amendment, in response to defendant Ford Motor Company's motion to serve a second amended answer containing a needless defense that the complaint fails to state a cause of action (see Bazinet v Lorenz, 70 A.D.2d...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases