STARKMAN v. SIGMOND


184 N.J. Super. 600 (1982)

446 A.2d 1249

TAMI STARKMAN AND DORA BIRNBAUM, PLAINTIFFS, v. ROBERT SIGMOND AND BARBARA SIGMOND, HIS WIFE, AND PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Camden County.

Decided March 25, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira Rabkin for plaintiffs (Molotsky, Rabkin & Gross, attorneys).

Michael Weiss for defendants Sigmond (Morris Goldsmith, attorney).


DEIGHAN, J.S.C.

The question to be resolved herein is whether plaintiff mortgagors are entitled to the proceeds of a fire insurance policy (which insures the interest of both the mortgagors and the mortgagees) to rebuild the residence or must the proceeds be applied in reduction of the mortgage where the value of the vacant land exceeds the balance due on the mortgage which has been kept current. Research has revealed no New Jersey case which addresses this problem...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases