MAHONEY v. MAHONEY


182 N.J. Super. 598 (1982)

442 A.2d 1062

MELVIN M. MAHONEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JUNE LEE MAHONEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 9, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Casale, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Casale & Segal, attorneys).

Edward J. McCrossin, III, argued the cause for respondent (Schumann, Hession, Kennelly & Dorment, attorneys; Henry F. Wolff, III on the brief).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, PRESSLER and PETRELLA.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

This divorce action requires us to consider the financial consequences of a spouse's professional license or educational degree and the presumed enhanced earning capacity of that spouse attributable thereto. Two fundamental questions must be addressed. The first is whether either the license or degree itself or the consequent enhanced earning potential attributable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases