1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 452 A.2d
  5. 452 A.2d 324 (1982)
 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. WOODY

No. 81-19.

452 A.2d 324 (1982)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellants, v. Joseph J. WOODY, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 13, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo N. Gorman, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on briefs, for appellants.

Charles H. Schulze, with whom Leonard C. Pederson, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on brief, for appellee.

Before NEWMAN, Chief Judge, and KERN and MACK, Associate Judges.

MACK, Associate Judge:

Appellants challenge the trial court's grant of a summary judgment in appellee's, a Metropolitan police officer's, favor. In 1979, appellee filed suit in Superior Court claiming that the administrative determination of the Metropolitan Police Department (Department) regarding the type of leave to which he was entitled under 5 U.S.C. § 6324 (1976) did not comport with due process. He, therefore, sued to recover the back pay to which he claimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases