BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, ETC. v. CAL. CONSOLIDATORS, INC.

No. 81-4292.

693 F.2d 81 (1982)

BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL NO. 70, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 2, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg & Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

James A. Carter, Spector, Stevens & Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, SWYGERT and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Local 70 wants to represent the employees at California Consolidators, Inc. To that end, on November 17, 1980, it filed a complaint against Consolidators under section 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). It alleged that Consolidators and Marathon Delivery Services constituted a single employer and sought a declaratory judgment that Consolidators was bound by the union's collective bargaining agreement with Marathon.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases