Two orders dated April 27, 1982 and May 25, 1982 affirmed, insofar as appealed from, and second order dated May 25, 1982 affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Defendant has not alleged in his affidavits opposing that branch of plaintiff's application which was for a wage deduction order, pursuant to section 49-b (subd 1, par [a]) of the Personal Property Law, substantial issues of material fact which would require a hearing (cf. Ciotti v Ciotti,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.