RAHMATI v. MEHRI

(10437), (10438)

188 Conn. 583 (1982)

IRAJ RAHMATI v. PARVIZ B. MEHRI PARVIZ B. MEHRI v. IRAJ RAHMATI

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released November 30, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lucy V. Katz, for the appellant (Mehri, defendant in the first case and plaintiff in the second case).

Harry Cohen, for the appellee (Rahmati, plaintiff in the first case and defendant in the second case).

PETERS, HEALEY, PARSKEY, SHEA and GRILLO, JS.


PETERS, J.

These cases arise out of open-ended oral arrangements under which two physicians were informally associated in the practice of ophthalmology in Danbury and New Milford for a period of two years. In the first case, the plaintiff, Dr. Iraj Rahmati, sued the defendant, Dr. Parviz Mehri, to recover moneys claimed to be due for services rendered. In the second case, in which the parties were reversed, Mehri sued for reimbursement of shared expenses and to recover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases