BURSTEIN v. BURSTEIN


182 N.J. Super. 586 (1982)

442 A.2d 1056

MARGARET BURSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID BURSTEIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 3, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for appellant (Rubenstein & Sherwood, attorneys; Jay Rubenstein on the brief).

Joseph Russo argued the cause for respondent (Arthur Uscher attorney).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, PRESSLER and PETRELLA.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

This is a post-judgment matrimonial controversy. By way of a consolidated appeal, defendant-husband David Burstein challenges two orders of the Chancery Division. The first granted the motion of plaintiff-wife Margaret Burstein for enforcement of an "arrearages" judgment in an amount in excess of $60,000 and denied defendant's motion to modify or vacate the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases