The judgment against the State followed an interlocutory judgment finding that the State had negligently maintained the highway shoulder and apportioning liability 10% to claimant, 50% to the vehicle's driver and 40% to the State. The State has taken this appeal and argues that the trial court mistakenly found that it owed a duty to claimant to maintain the highway shoulders for use by the traveling public. We agree.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.