SEIDEL v. VITA PASTRY CO., INC.

No. 5319 March term, 1979.

25 Pa. D. & C. 3d 718 (1982)

Seidel v. Vita Pastry Co., Inc.

Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.

February 11, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome M. Dubyn, for plaintiff.

Peter J. Neeson, for defendants.


MARUTANI, J., February 11, 1982.

Should an injured plaintiff be directed to comply with defendants' pretrial discovery motion pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 4010(a), seeking to have plaintiff interviewed and examined by defendants' vocational rehabilitation expert?

Contending that a vocational rehabilitation expert cannot qualify as a "physician," — the term used in Rule 4010(a), — plaintiff answers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases