TUENGE v. KONETSKI

No. 81-812.

320 N.W.2d 420 (1982)

Patricia L. and Raymond C. TUENGE, wife and husband, Appellants, v. Michael James KONETSKI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 11, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gislason & Martin and Robert W. Gislason, Edina, for appellants.

Rothstein, Wolf, Kaplan & Goff and Howard L. Kaplan, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


OTIS, Justice.

This is a tort action to recover damages for personal injury arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law. At issue is the construction of the offset provision of the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act (the Act), Minn.Stat. § 65B.51, subd. 1 (1980), which provides that any tort recovery arising out of an automobile accident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases