OVERFIELD v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION

No. AK-5.

418 So.2d 321 (1982)

Joel B. OVERFIELD, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Rehearing Denied September 1, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas D. Treece, of Bartlett, Treece & Peper, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Malcolm S. Greenfield, Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.


ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.

Overfield contends the Commission violated state and federal constitutional proscriptions against ex post facto laws by applying to him a matrix time range for parole release set by the rule in effect at the time of setting his presumptive parole release date rather than by the rule in effect when his crime occurred. We affirm.

Without extended discussion of whether amendments to the matrix rule constitute procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases