1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 90 N.J.
  5. 90 N.J. 646 (1982)
 

IN RE RACHMIEL

90 N.J. 646 (1982)

449 A.2d 505

IN THE MATTER OF JOEL I. RACHMIEL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 4, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel I. Rachmiel argued the cause pro se.

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

In this case, as in the companion case of In the Matter of Lennox Hinds, 90 N.J. 604 (1982), also decided today, we must determine the constitutionality of certain disciplinary rules regulating the extrajudicial speech of attorneys. The primary disciplinary rule involved bars an attorney associated either with the prosecution or defense of a criminal case from commenting on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases