1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 182 N.J.
  5. 182 N.J. Super. 553 (1982)
 

TULLIS v. TEIAL

182 N.J. Super. 553 (1982)

442 A.2d 1039

HENRIETTA TULLIS AND RICHARD TULLIS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WALTER TEIAL AND HUGO Y. RAMIREZ, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 27, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Horan argued the cause for appellants (Minichino & Mautone, attorneys).

Richard V. Wilde argued the cause for respondents (Romano, Hehl, Romankow & Wilde, attorneys; Theodore J. Romankow on the brief).

Before Judges ALLCORN, FRANCIS and MORTON I. GREENBERG.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MORTON I. GREENBERG, J.A.D.

This matter comes on appeal to this court as a result of a construction of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No Fault Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq., by a judge of the Superior Court, Law Division. We deal with a question concerning the interplay between N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12. Specifically, our problem is whether evidence of medical bills...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases