Clarence CRAIG, et al.
v.
LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTD., et al.
United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 22, 1982.
March 22, 1982.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Timothy C. Bolton, Hal C. Pitkow, Bolton & Pitkow, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs Clarence Craig and Duveen A. Craig.
Stephen S. Phillips, Patricia A. Carpenter, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Lac d'Amiante du Quebec, Ltee., formerly known as Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.
Joel D. Gusky, Harvey, Pennington, Herting, & Renneisen, Ltd., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Carey Canada, Inc.
Robert St. Leger Goggin, Daniel J. Ryan, Jr., Patricia Baxter Small, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants Johns-Manville Corp., Johns-Manville Amiante Canada, Inc. and Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
Anthony S. Minisi, Barry M. Klayman, Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant North American Asbestos Corp.
Robert J. Radano, Paoli, Pa., for defendant Continental Products Corp.
Andrew J. Trevelise, Edmund K. John, Malcolm & Riley, P. C., West Chester, Pa., for defendant The Celotex Corp.
John Patrick Kelley, Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
James A. Young, Daniel J. Zucker, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Owens-Illinois Glass Co. (now known as Owens-Illinois, Inc.).
John J. O'Brien, O'Brien & O'Brien, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move for remand of this case to state court, arguing that defendants filed their petition for removal after the expiration of the mandatory time limitation contained in the removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1446. The issue for decision is whether the praecipe for a writ of summons and the summons used in Pennsylvania procedure are, when served together, an initial pleading for purposes of the removal statute...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
