1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 641 P.2d
  5. 641 P.2d 68 (1982)
 

RON JONES & CO. v. FAYE WRIGHT, ETC.

LUBA No. 80-171; CA A21137.

641 P.2d 68 (1982)

56 Or.App. 70

RON JONES & CO., William Peterson, and Ron Jones, Petitioners, v. FAYE WRIGHT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING COUNCIL AND DEAN ORTON, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Erik Larson, Salem, argued cause for petitioners. With him on brief was Brand, Lee, Ferris & Embick, Salem.

Richard C. Stein, Salem, argued cause for respondents. With him on brief was Ramsay, Stein, Feibleman & Myers, Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., YOUNG, J., and ROBERTS, J. Pro Tem.

ROBERTS, Judge Pro Tem.

This is a case challenging the City of Salem's issuance of a variance for construction of a cul-de-sac street 300 feet longer than the 800-foot limit imposed by Salem Revised Code 63.225(c). The issue has twice been before the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). LUBA first held the variance invalid, declaring the city's findings were inadequate to demonstrate compliance with the criteria set forth in Salem Revised Code 63.332(a).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases