OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ODOM, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of kidnapping and assessed punishment by the jury at 10 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted petition for review to consider whether the Court of Appeals improperly found harmless error in the admission of evidence of a void conviction.
Appellant asserts that since the prior conviction was based upon a void information,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.