Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the convictions and sentences for robbery in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and new trial ordered as to said counts. As so modified, judgment affirmed.
It was improper for the prosecutor to question the defendant about aliases used in connection with arrests made where those arrests were not subject to cross-examination under a
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.