LECTUS, INC. v. RAINIER NAT'L BANK

No. 47721-3.

97 Wn.2d 584 (1982)

647 P.2d 1001

LECTUS, INC., Petitioner, v. RAINIER NATIONAL BANK, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 8, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Critchlow & Williams, by Michael E. de Grasse, for petitioner.

Graham & Dunn, by R. Bruce Johnston and Olson & Olson, by Orville B. Olson, for respondents.


DIMMICK, J.

We are asked to adopt Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 217A (Tent. Drafts Nos. 1-7, 1973) (hereafter § 217A)1 and thus recognize promissory estoppel as a theory of recovery notwithstanding the statute of frauds, RCW 19.36.010.2 We decline to do so at this time.

Lectus, Inc., petitioner herein, sued Rainier National Bank and Rainier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases