1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 641 P.2d
  5. 641 P.2d 37 (1982)
 

STATE v. HOWELL

No. C 80-11-34026; CA A20478.

641 P.2d 37 (1982)

56 Or.App. 6

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Darrell William HOWELL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the attorney-client privilege protects certain information disclosed by the defense to the state in a pre-trial conference in a criminal case.1

Defendant was charged with kidnapping in the first degree, attempted sodomy in the first degree and rape in the first degree. Pursuant to the Multnomah County Circuit Court Rules,2 a pre-trial conference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases