BLANKENSHIP v. CINCINNATI MILACRON CHEMICALS

No. 81-402.

69 Ohio St. 2d 608 (1982)

BLANKENSHIP ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CINCINNATI MILACRON CHEMICALS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 3, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kondritzer, Gold & Frank Co., L.P.A., Mr. William E. Clements, Jerald D. Harris Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Jerald D. Harris, for appellants.

Messrs. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister and Mr. Gerald J. Rapien, for appellees.


WILLIAM B. BROWN, J.

The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted appellees' motion to dismiss appellants' complaint on the grounds that an employee is barred by Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, and R. C. 4123.74 and 4123.741 from prosecuting an action at law for an intentional tort.

At the outset, it must be remembered that the appellants are appealing from an order granting a motion to dismiss pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases