IN RE DOE APPLICATION, PRE-INDICTMENT DISCOVERY


184 N.J. Super. 492 (1982)

446 A.2d 572

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JOHN DOE FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE TAPES AND TRANSCRIPTS OF HIS CONVERSATIONS THAT WERE INTERCEPTED OVER A TELEPHONE FACILITY IN NEW JERSEY.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.

Decided April 9, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. Finegan and Michael Ross of the New York Bar for applicant John Doe (LaRossa, Brownstein & Mitchell, attorneys).

Norman J. Schroeder, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of New Jersey (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey; Mark M. Baker, Special Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, Thomas A. Duffy, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, New York State Department of Law Office of the Special Prosecutor).


SIMPSON, A.J.S.C.

This is an application for pre-indictment discovery of wiretapped telephone conversations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-16 that provides in pertinent part:

The court, upon filing of a motion, may in its discretion make available to such persons or their attorneys for inspection such portions of the intercepted communications, applications and orders as the court determines to be in the interest of justice.

John Doe (not the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases