GARRETT v. GOODWIN

No. LR-C-82-385.

569 F.Supp. 106 (1982)

Gary GARRETT, Steve Garrett, Craig Dowland, Donna Dowland, Bruce Silverman, Wyatt Carey, Dave Somers, James Bishop, Rebecca Turner, and Greg Parish, Plaintiffs, v. Col. Tommy L. GOODWIN, Director of the Arkansas State Police; Lt. Col. George Moye, Arkansas State Police; Maj. Buren Jackson, Arkansas State Police; Capt. Dave Davidson, Arkansas State Police; Lt. Dave Rosegrant, Arkansas State Police; Lt. Fred Odom, Arkansas State Police; Sgt. Bob Cooper, State Police; Sgt. Dwight Tosh, Arkansas State Police; Sgt. Bill Young, Arkansas State Police; Capt. Jim Beach, Arkansas State Police; Manuel Holcomb, Director of the Arkansas State Crime Laboratory; Roy Johnson, Chief of the State Highway Police; Division of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department; Capt. Max Ray, State Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department; Lt. Charles Breeding, State Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department; Lt. Danny McClean, State Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department; Sgt. Tommy Briggs, State Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department; Charles Dye, Chief of the Blytheville, Arkansas, Police Department; Sgt. Mike Medford, Blytheville, Arkansas, Police Department; and Coolidge Conlee, St. Francis County Sheriff, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, W.D.

December 17, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arkansas Civil Liberties Foundation, Inc., John Wesley Hall, Jr., Larry D. Vaught, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., for defendants Goodwin, Moye, Jackson, Davidson, Rosegrant, Odom, Cooper, Tosh, Young, Beach, and Holcomb.

Chris Parker, Ark. H. and T. Dept., Little Rock, Ark., for defendants Johnson, Ray, Breeding, McClean, and Briggs.

Graham Sudbury, Blytheville, Ark., for defendants Dye and Medford.

Fletcher Long, Jr., Forrest City, Ark., for defendant Conlee.


GEORGE HOWARD, Jr., District Judge.

CONSENT DECREE AND JUDGMENT

Based on the Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered in this case, the parties enter into the following consent decree for injunctive relief:

1. The Court adopts the Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as the findings of the court in this case under F.R.C.P. 52(a).

2. The Court further finds that the conduct of this roadblock, as it affected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases