MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROC. AGAINST MARCUS & TEPPER

No. 80-259-D.

107 Wis.2d 560 (1982)

320 N.W.2d 806

IN the MATTER OF the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Jack L. MARCUS & Jerome A. TEPPER, Attorneys at Law.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 2, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility there were briefs and oral argument by Robert H. Bichler, of Racine.

For Jack Marcus there was a brief by David A. Saichek, Theodore B. Hertel, Jr., and Saichek & Hertel, S.C., of Milwaukee, and oral argument by David A. Saichek.

For Jerome Tepper there was a brief by Robert E. Sutton and oral argument by Walter F. Kelly, both of Milwaukee.


DAY, J.

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; complaint dismissed.

This is an appeal by the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (hereinafter Board)1 from an order of the referee dismissing the complaints of professional misconduct filed against respondents Jack L. Marcus and Jerome A. Tepper (hereinafter respondents).2 The referee found that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases