1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 105 Wis.2d
  5. 105 Wis.2d 553 (1982)
 

STATE v. STANFIELD

No. 80-2066-CR.

105 Wis.2d 553 (1982)

314 N.W.2d 339

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Carl STANFIELD, d/b/a Canine College, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 18, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-petitioner the cause was argued by Jonathan P. Siner, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief (in this court) was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the defendant-appellant there was a brief (in court of appeals) and oral argument by Roland J. Steinle, Jr., of Cedarburg.

Reversing 102 Wis.2d 728, 308 N.W.2d 772.

DAY, J.

There are two issues presented on this review. First, is intent or negligence an element of the crime of mistreating animals, sec. 948.02,1 Stats. 1975. Second, was sufficient evidence presented to convict defendant-appellant Carl A. Stanfield, (Stanfield) of being party to the crime of mistreating animals, set forth in secs. 939.052 and 948.02, Stats...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases