LORAL REALTY v. BEAUTY DEV.


114 Misc.2d 541 (1982)

Loral Realty Company, Appellant, v. Beauty Development Corp. et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

February 19, 1982


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gellman & Gellman (Joseph H. Gellman of counsel), for appellant. Gering, Gross & Gross (Lawrence J. Gross of counsel), for Beauty Development Corp., respondent.

BUSCHMANN, J. P., JONES and KUNZEMAN, JJ., concur.


MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously modified to the extent of granting summary judgment to respondent Beauty and dismissing the petition. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs.

The issue presented on this appeal appears to be one of first impression. Does a lessee, under the terms of its lease, violate the prohibition against assignment or has it entered into an approved sublease when it leases a portion of the demised premises for a term extending into...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases