1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 111 Ill.
  5. 111 Ill. App.3d 536 (1982)
 

WEED v. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTH.

No. 81-3006.

111 Ill. App.3d 536 (1982)

444 N.E.2d 733

NANCY WEED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (4th Division).

Opinion filed December 30, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Kates, of Chicago, for appellant.

Jeremiah Marsh, Michael Schneiderman, Michael M. Conway, John L. Rogers III, and Albert C. Maule, all of Hopkins & Sutter, of Chicago (Carl J. Frank, General Counsel of the Regional Transportation Authority, of counsel), for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE JIGANTI delivered the opinion of the court:

This action challenges the validity of a Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) ordinance which resulted in a passenger fare increase in the area served by the RTA. The plaintiff, Nancy Weed, brought this declaratory judgment action on her own behalf and on behalf of the class of persons who patronize the railroads within the RTA region...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases