1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 187 N.J.
  5. 187 N.J. Super. 455 (1982)
 

MURNICK v. ASBURY PARK

187 N.J. Super. 455 (1982)

455 A.2d 504

THEODORE MURNICK AND MAXINE MURNICK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 24, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward G. Rosenblum argued the cause for appellant (Rosenblum & Rosenblum, attorneys; Edward G. Rosenblum of counsel and on the brief).

Carl G. Weisenfeld argued the cause for respondents (Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney, attorneys; Carl G. Weisenfeld of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges BOTTER, POLOW and BRODY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by POLOW, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs are the owners of a 15-story apartment building in Asbury Park. On their tax appeal the Tax Court granted reductions in total assessments for 1977, 1978 and 1979 based upon discrimination. Murnick v. Asbury Park, 2 N.J.Tax 168 (1981). Although the city filed a notice of appeal from the entire judgment, it has presented no argument with respect to the reduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases