FORTY v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. OF REV.

No. 590 C.D. 1981.

67 Pa.Commw. 574 (1982)

Dolores A. Forty, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

July 21, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond P. Amatangelo, Brady, Amatangelo & Baisley, for petitioner.

Charles Hasson, Associate Counsel, with him Francine Ostrovsky, Associate Counsel, and Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.

Argued May 7, 1982, before Judges BLATT, WILLIAMS, JR. and CRAIG, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE BLATT, July 21, 1982:

The petitioner asserts that the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) erred by denying her unemployment benefits on the grounds that she had voluntarily terminated her employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.1

The referee found2 that the petitioner left her employment as a seamstress after becoming upset with a co-worker and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases