CRISPIN v. CRISPIN

Nos. 81-755, 81-1573.

411 So.2d 218 (1982)

Martha C. CRISPIN, Appellant, v. Samuel B. CRISPIN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied April 7, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and Paul A. Louis, Miami, for appellant.

Gaston, Snow, Ely, Bartlett, Hall & Swann and Richard H.M. Swann, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

From the record presented for review, we conclude that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court and, therefore, cannot find that the trial court abused its discretion. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). Additionally, contrary to appellant's contention, the trial court did not, ipso facto, abuse its discretion by awarding attorneys' fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases