1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 188 N.J.
  5. 188 N.J. Super. 439 (1982)
 

AMATO v. RANDOLPH TP. PLANNING BD.

188 N.J. Super. 439 (1982)

457 A.2d 1188

PHILIP AMATO AND DONNA AMATO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD AND RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 16, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert M. Strulowitz argued the cause for the appellants.

Roy E. Kurnos argued the cause for the respondents.

Before Judges MICHELS, PRESSLER and TRAUTWEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

This action in lieu of prerogative writs implicates heretofore unconstrued provisions of the 1975 Municipal Land Use Law, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 et seq., dealing with minor subdivisions and the respective jurisdictions of the planning board and the board of adjustment in respect thereof.

Plaintiffs Philip and Donna Amato own a parcel of land in Randolph Township, slightly more than two acres...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases