1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 292 Md.
  5. 292 Md. 328 (1982)
 

MARTENS CHEVROLET v. SENEY

[No. 64, September Term, 1981.]

292 Md. 328 (1982)

439 A.2d 534

MARTENS CHEVROLET, INC. ET AL. v. HOWARD F. SENEY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 5, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Michael Tobin and James S. Groves, with whom were Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Tobin & Ecker, P.A. on the brief, for appellants.

Lee T. Ellis, Jr. for appellee Howard F. Seney. William H. Clarke, with whom were Galiher, Clarke, Martell & Donnelly on the brief, for other appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, DIGGES, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON and RODWSKY, JJ.

DIGGES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this action we consider whether there still exists in Maryland a tort suit for negligent misrepresentation independent of one for deceit. The case arose when appellant Martens Chevrolet, Inc.1 instituted in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County this action against the appellees, Loving Chevrolet, Inc. and its sole stockholders, Franklin Loving and Howard F. Seney, alleging in separate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases