STICKEL v. STICKEL

No. 8114DC1022.

294 S.E.2d 321 (1982)

Cathrine Linton STICKEL v. Delford Lefew STICKEL.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 17, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maxwell, Freeman & Beason by James B. Maxwell, Durham, for plaintiff-appellee.

Hunter, Wharton & Howell by John V. Hunter, III, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.


MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues by his first assignment that the trial court violated the best evidence rule by allowing plaintiff to introduce into evidence financial lists, or summaries, prepared from checks and itemized expenditures, which she used to show her past and future living expenses. Defendant contends that since there was no showing that the records upon which the summaries were based were so voluminous as to make it impracticable to examine them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases