BOMSE v. MULLIN


183 N.J. Super. 431 (1982)

444 A.2d 73

EMANUEL M. BOMSE AND MARGUERITE D. BOMSE, PLAINTIFFS, v. NEIL MULLIN, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 31, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Balk, Goldberger, Mandell, Seligsohn & O'Connor, for plaintiffs (Louis David Balk on the brief).

Neil Mullin, defendant, pro se.

Before Judges FRITZ, ARD and TRAUTWEIN.


PER CURIAM.

The novel question raised by defendant's motion for leave to appeal in this matter is whether the subject matter jurisdiction of the county district court, limited to $5,000 exclusive of costs (N.J.S.A. 2A:6-34(a)), extends to an 11-count complaint, each count of which alleged a debt evidenced by a note for less than $5,000 but the aggregate of which totalled $8,740. We are satisfied that it does not.

When the reach of a statute is explored...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases