MATEEN v. CONNECTICUT TRANSIT

Civ. A. No. N-81-428.

550 F.Supp. 52 (1982)

Shamsiddin MATEEN, Plaintiff, v. CONNECTICUT TRANSIT, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 5, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shamsiddin Mateen, pro se.

John C. Yavis, Jr., Barry J. Waters, Murtha, Cullina, Richter & Pinney, Hartford, Conn., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZAMPANO, District Judge.

In this pro se civil rights action, tried to the Court, plaintiff alleges that the defendant, Connecticut Transit, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., by discriminating against him in employment on the basis of race and religion. For reasons set forth in two opinions, filed December 2, 1981 and May 6, 1982, this Court denied the plaintiff's motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases