LYNN v. LYNN


91 N.J. 510 (1982)

453 A.2d 539

ROBERT LYNN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. BONNIE LYNN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 15, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry I. Croland argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Stern, Steiger, Croland & Bornstein, attorneys; Barry I. Croland, Myra T. Peterson and Irene U. Mecky, on the briefs).

Stephen H. Roth argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.

This is a companion case to Mahoney v. Mahoney, 91 N.J. 488, and Hill v. Hill, 91 N.J. 506, both decided today. The facts of this case are more complicated than those of Mahoney and Hill, and the need for legal redress for the less fortunate party in this case is more acute. However, the legal principles that must be used...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases