HILL v. HILL


91 N.J. 506 (1982)

453 A.2d 537

ANITA HILL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT HILL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 15, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Rosen argued the cause for appellant (Rosen & Garodnick, attorneys).

W. Marshall Prettyman argued the cause for respondent.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.

This is a companion case to Mahoney v. Mahoney, 91 N.J. 488, decided today. For the reasons expressed in that opinion, we modify the judgment of the Appellate Division and remand the case to the trial court to consider a limited award of either rehabilitative or reimbursement alimony.

I

The parties were married in New York in 1973. At that time plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases