1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 414 Mich.
  5. 414 Mich. 181 (1982)
 

PUTNEY v. HASKINS

Docket No. 63769, (Calendar No. 7).

414 Mich. 181 (1982)

324 N.W.2d 739

PUTNEY v. HASKINS

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided September 28, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cicinelli, Mossner, Majoros & Alexander, P.C. (by Eugene D. Mossner and William S. Pearson), for plaintiffs.

Smith & Brooker, P.C. (by A.T. Lippert, Jr., and Thomas A. Connolly), for defendants.

Decided September 28, 1982. Rehearing denied post, 1111.

RYAN, J.

The dispositive issue in this action under the "dramshop act"1 is whether the plaintiffs were properly allowed to continue their suit against the defendant "dramshop" after settling with the allegedly intoxicated defendant. The fact that the allegedly intoxicated defendant continued as a nominal party and was not formally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases