1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 182 N.J.
  5. 182 N.J. Super. 396 (1982)
 

BERKO v. FREDA

182 N.J. Super. 396 (1982)

442 A.2d 208

JOHN BERKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RALPH FREDA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND PAUL HARRIGAN, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 25, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley W. Greenfield argued the cause for appellant (Stanley W. Greenfield and Douglas C. Greenfield, attorneys; Stanley W. Greenfield, on the brief).

Daniel K. Van Dorn argued the cause for respondent (McDermott & McGee, attorneys; Daniel K. Van Dorn of counsel and on the brief.

Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment of the Law Division solely on the ground that the fireman's rule applies to a policeman in the context of this case, substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Griffin in Part II of his written opinion reported in Berko v. Freda, 172 N.J.Super. 436, 440-442 (Law Div. 1980). See Trainor v. Santana,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases