1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 64 Pa.Commw.
  5. 64 Pa.Commw. 509 (1982)
 

LASKEY ET AL. v. BRUNO ET AL.

No. 3058 C.D. 1980.

64 Pa.Commw. 509 (1982)

Daniel Laskey, Richard Roach and Patrick Connolly, Individually and on Behalf of all Similarly Situated Taxpayers in The Borough of Blawnox, Appellants v. Jake Bruno et al., Appellees.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

February 10, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Mall, with him James Victor Voss, Meyer, Unkovic & Scott, for appellants.

John F. Cambest, Conway, Meyer & Cambest, for appellees.

Argued October 7, 1981, before President Judge CRUMLISH, JR., and Judges ROGERS and BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE BLATT, February 10, 1982:

The appellants, three residents and taxpayers of the Borough of Blawnox (Borough), individually and on behalf of all other taxpayers situated similarly appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County sustaining the appellees' preliminary objection that the appellants' complaint in equity was premature because a statutory remedy existed under Section 1044 of The Borough Code (Code).1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases