1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 69 Ohio
  5. 69 Ohio St. 2d 500 (1982)
 

CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD v. BETHEL TOWNSHIP

Nos. 81-881 and 81-884.

69 Ohio St. 2d 500 (1982)

CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, APPELLANT AND APPELLEE, v. BETHEL TOWNSHIP OF CLARK COUNTY, OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES AND APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 3, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James F. Peifer, director of law, and Mr. David R. Collins, for city of Springfield.

Mr. James A. Berry, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. David E. Smith, for Bethel Township, Moorefield Township and Clark County.

Per Curiam.

I.

In case No. 81-881, Springfield sets forth six propositions of law for our consideration. Each questions a separate calculation of the BTA and, except as otherwise noted, each will be discussed separately herein.

A.

In reviewing Springfield's estimated total expenditures for 1976, the BTA noted that the sum of $540,448 was included in Springfield's 1976 budget as a "Contingencies" account. The BTA held that this account...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases