PUREX CORP. v. W. C. A. B. ET AL.

No. 530 C.D. 1981.

66 Pa.Commw. 499 (1982)

Purex Corporation, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board and Richard R. Ross, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

May 17, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Craven, with him Jo Marjorie Fineman, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, for petitioner.

Francis X. Dillon, Timby and Dillon, P.C., for respondent, Richard R. Ross.

Argued March 5, 1982, before Judges ROGERS, CRAIG and MacPHAIL, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE MacPHAIL, May 17, 1982:

Purex Corporation (Petitioner) appeals from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee's order awarding workmen's compensation benefits to Richard R. Ross (Claimant) for serious and permanent disfigurement under Section 306(c)(22) of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act (Act).1 We affirm.

Claimant was employed by Petitioner as a checker and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases